I got up at 5:15 a.m. on Saturday morning with the idea of driving 100 miles to watch the sun rise over the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta.
Editorial: Santa Clara water district’s courageous Delta vote raises question of what’s next?
Santa Clara Valley Water District rejects Jerry Brown’s twin Delta tunnels plan
Skelton: Brown should settle for just one Delta tunnel
Key vote on Jerry Brown’s $17 billion Delta tunnels project Tuesday in San Jose
Opinion: Delta farmers, not WaterFix tunnels, are our best climate change defense
State auditor rips Jerry Brown’s $17 billion Delta tunnels project
I wanted to show my 84-year-old mom the beauty of one of California’s best-kept secrets. Maybe see some of the Delta’s magnificent sandhill cranes capable of flying up to 400 miles in a single day. But my real goal was to get a clearer perspective on the merit of building a single, 35-mile tunnel to provide a more reliable supply of water for generations of thirsty Californians.
What we got instead was a thick layer of fog. No cranes. No fish jumping. When we arrived in Courtland, we couldn’t even see the Sacramento River 50 yards in front of our noses. Nothing could have served as a better metaphor for the battle over the Delta’s murky future.
I’ve been wrestling with the question of whether the single-tunnel alternative would be in the state’s best interest for years. The issue moved to the front burner after Westlands Water District and the Santa Clara Valley Water District made it clear last month that they wanted no part of Gov. Jerry Brown’s massive, $17 billion twin-tunnel proposal.
Thank goodness. That was a bad idea from the beginning. A water grab of the worst kind that threatened to do further damage to the fragile Delta and the quality of the fresh water supply that the Bay Area depends on.
The governor still hasn’t completely given up on his twin tunnels. But he has indicated a willingness to back a single-tunnel project …read more
Source:: The Mercury News – Latest News